March 22, 2024Presented by the Bitcoin Policy Institute Good morning and happy March Madness. This week, we review court sanctions against the SEC, a Congressional oversight hearing, and why the SEC says it needs more funding. Top Points
Court Sanctions SEC for Making Misleading StatementsThe Order On Monday, a federal district court in Utah sanctioned the SEC for making misleading statements that lead the Court to grant a Temporary Restraining Order against crypto firm defendant Debt Box, LLC.
In short, at a July 2023 TRO hearing where defendants were not present, an SEC attorney claimed defendants had closed 33 bank accounts in the previous 48 hours in an effort to evade law enforcement. Order at 44-45. Turns out, the SEC did not have any direct evidence to support this claim (or several others). In fact, no accounts were closed in the 48 hours before the hearing, and there was no evidence that defendants were responsible for closing any of their bank accounts in the past three years. Order at 44-45. The court admonished the SEC for knowingly making the false statements, failing to correct the record, and then doubling down: "Thus, in its Opposition the Commission not only exacerbated its misconduct from the TRO hearing by seeking to affirm and reiterate the false statement it had previously made—a statement it knew was false from the time it made it and failed to correct—but it engaged in further misconduct by communicating an additional false and misleading statement to the court after being confronted with irrefutable evidence of its error." Id. at 53 (emphasis added). The Court described the SEC's conduct as "a gross abuse of the power entrusted to it by Congress and substantially undermined the integrity of these proceedings and the judicial process." Id. at 73 (emphasis added). The order also describes the harm caused by the SEC's misstatements: "Relying on the Commission’s representations, the court granted the ex parte TRO, froze Defendants’ accounts and other assets, and appointed the requested Receiver. As a result, companies were seized, assets were frozen, and lives were upended." Id. at 63 (emphasis added). Perhaps most concerning, Judge Shelby suggested the conduct goes beyond the actions of rogue attorneys: " [T]hough there are individual attorneys against whom imposition of attorneys’ fees and costs may be warranted, the pervasive misconduct exhibited demonstrates a pattern of organizational bad faith and broadly implicates the Commission itself—not just isolated individuals." Id. at 40 fn. 284. What's Next? The SEC now has to pay defendants' legal costs arising from the TRO. Order at 79. But the case is not over. The SEC had asked the court to dismiss the case without prejudice so it could review the record, take investigative steps, and determine whether to file a new complaint. Id. at 38. The Court denied the SEC's motion to dismiss, noting the SEC failed to provide any "legal authority or argument in support of its request" and that the motion was opposed by defendants. Id. at 77-78. In closing, the court cautioned that the Order "should not be construed as offering any views on the underlying merits of the case." Order at 79-80. Congress Responds Republicans took notice of the decision, including HFSC Chair McHenry. Senator Bill Hagerty (R-TN), Senate Banking Committee member, also weighed in: Rep. French Hill (R-AR), Chair of the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Digital Assets, also raised the case in the hearing discussed below. SEC Oversight HearingOn Wednesday, the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Capital Markets held an SEC oversight hearing. Most of the hearing focused broadly on the SEC's rulemaking process and matters unrelated to crypto. The few crypto-focused exchanges are summarized below. Scope of SEC Power Rep. French Hill (R-AR) criticized the SEC’s frequent attempts to test the agency's statutory limits:
To support his claim, Rep. Hill cited the SEC’s recent losses in the courts, mentioning Ripple, Grayscale, and the Debt Box case discussed above.
SAB 121 Rep. Brad Sherman (D-CA) briefly criticized the crypto industry for asking for rules and then complaining when rules are issued against them, citing industry opposition to SAB 121. Conversely, Rep. Wiley Nickel (D-NC) expressed his concerns with SAB 121, flagging the SEC's process in issuing the rule, which GAO found violated the Congressional Review Act.
Innovation & Competition Rep. Zachary Nunn (R-IA) asked how the SEC's current regulatory approach is impacting innovation.
SEC Submits Funding Justification RequestOn Monday, the SEC submitted its Congressional Budget Justification for FY 2025. The SEC asks for $2.59 billion in funding - $158 million more than last year's request. The SEC says market growth, particularly in private funds, and changes in the markets, such as increased use of AI, justify a funding boost. The justification also singles out crypto in its Executive Summary:
Three main points to note regarding crypto:
How does GOP Whip Tom Emmer (R-MN) feel about the justification? Look AheadCongress is expected to break for an Easter recess after it clears a government funding bill.
A Message from the Bitcoin Policy Institute Don't miss the most important crypto policy event of the year! The Bitcoin Policy Summit is taking place on April 9th in Washington, DC at the historic National Press Club. How Do I Get Tickets? Click the button below and use password "btcpolicyorg."
Use code "CAPHILL20" to receive 20% off your ticket. Tickets will sell out, so don't delay! Federal government employees attend for free - simply fill out this form. For those seeking financial assistance, email Grant McCarty directly at grant@btcpolicy.org to see if you are eligible. Quick HitsStablecoin Legislation
Ether
CBDCs
Crypto in the Courts
Thank you for reading and please enjoy your weekend. Sincerely, GSL Warpcast: @caphillcrypto Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up 👇
*All information contained in this newsletter is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal or financial advice. You should conduct your own research, and consult an independent financial, tax, or legal advisor before making any investment decisions. The author may own cryptocurrencies discussed herein. **Cap Hill Crypto, LLC is an official media sponsor of the Bitcoin Policy Summit and receives a 20% commission on all Bitcoin Policy Summit tickets sold using the discount code CAPHILL20. |
Interested in the intersection of crypto, blockchain, web3 and policy? I'm a former U.S. Senate staffer and lawyer writing a newsletter focused on creating nonpartisan, hype-free crypto policy content that is accessible to all.
September 6, 2024 View in Browser - Sign Up Good morning and happy Friday. Congress returns to session on Monday for a sprint through September before breaking for the election. This week's edition previews what to watch for this fall, before and after November 5th. Top Points While votes on crypto legislation are likely on pause until after the election, September is expected to include Congressional hearings on DeFi, SEC oversight, and possibly more crypto-related issues. Uniswap Labs...
March 15, 2024 Presented by the Bitcoin Policy Institute View in Browser - Sign Up Good morning. This week, we review a House hearing on digital payments, crypto-related tax proposals in President Biden's budget, and a letter from two Senators opposed to crypto ETFs. For those looking to test their bracketology skills against fellow crypto policy enthusiasts, join the second annual Cap Hill Crypto bracket pool! Password: SATOSHI. Top Points A House Financial Services subcommittee examined the...
February 9, 2024 Sign Up - View in Browser Good morning and happy Friday. This week, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen testified before House and Senate oversight committees, and Rep. Maxine Waters said a stablecoin deal is "very, very, close." Top Points House Financial Services Committee Members discussed FSOC's call for Congress to address regulatory gaps for stablecoins and "crypto-assets that are not securities." HFSC Chair McHenry and House Ag Chair Thompson led a letter to Sec. Yellen...