Good morning, and happy February. This week, we look at Senate Banking Ranking Member Tim Scott's priorities, the Digital Asset Subcommittee's roster, a follow up letter to Silvergate, and the White House's roadmap to mitigate crypto risks.
This week's newsletter is presented by Cap Hill Crypto's Legislative Tracker—use the tracker to read high-level summaries of every crypto related bill and stay on top of recent bill developments from committee votes to new cosponsors.
| 118th Congress - Crypto Legislative Tracker |
Senator Tim Scott Includes "Developing a Framework for Digital Assets" in Outline of His Priorities for 118th Congress
On Thursday, Ranking Member Tim Scott (R-SC) laid out seven priorities for the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. See full memo here.
According to the memo, Senator Scott will work "to ensure that the U.S. financial services system best helps American families find success and financial stability." It also notes Senator Scott is a "longtime advocate for increasing financial inclusion and advancing opportunity, especially for underserved and underrepresented communities."
Here's the full section on digital asset regulations:
In an accompanying press release, found here, the Ranking Member said the Committee will "work to facilitate a bipartisan regulatory framework that accounts for both the rapid growth in the use of cryptocurrencies and the concerns raised by high-profile failures."
The other six priorities included in the memo are:
So What?
This is pretty high-level language but the focus on protecting consumers and financial stability generally may bode well for finding common ground with Chairman Sherrod Brown (D-OH). While the Chairman is generally skeptical of crypto, last November he wrote a letter to Secretary Yellen about the need to work together on crypto legislation and fill regulatory gaps to address consumer and financial stability risks posed by crypto.
House Financial Services Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion Roster Finalized
Here's a look at the Subcommittee's members and their "crypto sentiment" per Coinbase's in-app crypto advocacy feature.
Senators Send Follow Up Letter to Silvergate Bank
On Monday, January 30, U.S. Senators Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Roger Marshall (R-KS), and John Kennedy (R-LA) sent a follow up letter to Silvergate bank ("Silvergate"), finding the crypto-focused bank's response to their initial letter "evasive and incomplete."
See "the Letter" here.
Background
On December 5, 2022, the same three Senators asked Silvergate to respond to a series of questions about the bank's alleged failure to monitor and report suspicious transactions. In particular, the letter focused on the bank's alleged role in transferring FTX customer funds to Alameda (FTX's sister company/hedge-fund). See "Initial Letter" here.
On December 19, 2022, Silvergate's CEO, Alan J. Lane, replied to the Senators, but declined to provide specific answers to questions regarding the bank's anti-money laundering and bank secrecy act compliance measures, claiming federal law prohibits disclosure of "confidential supervisory information." See "Silvergate Letter" here.
For those looking to take a deeper dive, the Silvergate letter cites 12 C.F.R. § 261.4 (Prohibition against disclosure) and 31 C.F.R. §1020.32(e)(1)(i) (Confidentiality of [Suspicious Action Reports]) as the basis for not responding in full.
The Letter
The Senators said they are "disappointed by" the "evasive and incomplete response to our December 5, 2022 letter," describing Silvergate's basis for refusing to provide full answers "not an acceptable rationale." Letter at 1, 2.
In addition, the Letter raises concern with Silvergate borrowing $4.3 billion from the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. According to the Letter, this could put U.S. taxpayers on the hook, should Silvergate fail. See Letter at 1-2.
Moreover, Silvergate's responses affirmed that Alameda opened an account with Silvergate in 2018 and that Silvergate "conducted significant due diligence on FTX and related entities...both during the onboarding process and through ongoing monitoring." Letter at 2. Thus, the Senators say, these insights show "Silvergate had risk management and due diligence processes in place – but that they did, in fact, fail miserably." Id.
The Ask
In light of the concerns outlined above, the Senators ask Silvergate to answer more questions about the extent to which Silvergate may have transferred FTX customer funds to Alameda and the bank's compliance and risk management processes, by February 13, 2023. Letter at 3-4.
The Senators also reiterated their request for complete answers to their Initial Letter. Letter at 4-5.
White House Issues "Roadmap to Mitigate Cryptocurrencies' Risks"
On Friday, January 27, the White House published a roadmap highlighting (1) risks posed by crypto, (2) how the administration is mitigating those risks, and (3) what it would like to see from Congress.
Full text.
(1) What risks is the Administration focused on?
(2) What is the Administration doing to mitigate risks?
(3) What would the Administration like to see Congress do?
Congressional Hearings
Other
Last Week's A: The two Congressmen to serve as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court were:
This Week's Q: In May 2007, this former Fed Chairman who went on to win a Nobel Prize in economics proclaimed: “Given the fundamental factors in place that should support the demand for housing, we believe the effect of the troubles in the subprime sector on the broader housing market will likely be limited."
Thank you for reading, and please enjoy your weekend.
Sincerely,
GSL
Catch me on Damus 🤙
P.S. Was this email forwarded to you? Click the link below to join leading policy professionals from Capitol Hill and industry by signing up for the free Friday morning newsletter.
| Cap Hill Crypto |
Interested in the intersection of crypto, blockchain, web3 and policy? I'm a former U.S. Senate staffer and lawyer writing a newsletter focused on creating nonpartisan, hype-free crypto policy content that is accessible to all.
September 6, 2024 View in Browser - Sign Up Good morning and happy Friday. Congress returns to session on Monday for a sprint through September before breaking for the election. This week's edition previews what to watch for this fall, before and after November 5th. Top Points While votes on crypto legislation are likely on pause until after the election, September is expected to include Congressional hearings on DeFi, SEC oversight, and possibly more crypto-related issues. Uniswap Labs...
March 22, 2024 Presented by the Bitcoin Policy Institute View in Browser - Sign Up Good morning and happy March Madness. This week, we review court sanctions against the SEC, a Congressional oversight hearing, and why the SEC says it needs more funding. Top Points A federal district court sanctioned the SEC for knowingly making misleading statements in its case against a crypto firm; Republicans in Congress took notice. At an SEC oversight hearing, Members debated the policy and process...
March 15, 2024 Presented by the Bitcoin Policy Institute View in Browser - Sign Up Good morning. This week, we review a House hearing on digital payments, crypto-related tax proposals in President Biden's budget, and a letter from two Senators opposed to crypto ETFs. For those looking to test their bracketology skills against fellow crypto policy enthusiasts, join the second annual Cap Hill Crypto bracket pool! Password: SATOSHI. Top Points A House Financial Services subcommittee examined the...